This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Carey, L. M. Articles by Donnan, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carey, L. M. Articles by Donnan, G. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Evolution of Brain Activation with Good and Poor Motor Recovery after Stroke

National Stroke Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia, lcarey{at}nsri.org.au

David F. Abbott, PhD

Brain Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia

Gary F. Egan, PhD

Howard Florey Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Graham J. O’Keefe, PhD

Centre for Positron Emission Tomography, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia

Graham D. Jackson, MD

Brain Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia

Julie Bernhardt, PhD

National Stroke Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia

Geoffrey A. Donnan, MD

National Stroke Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia

Objective. To characterize the evolution of brain activation in stroke patients with variable motor recovery and quantify changes relative to healthy controls. Methods. Serial PET activation studies, using a simple finger-tapping task, and quantitative measures of motor performance were obtained in 9 patients (2-7 weeks poststroke and 6 months later) and compared with serial healthy volunteer data. Results. Patients with moderate impairment and good recovery (n = 5) activated the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1) contralateral to the paretic hand moved, bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA), contralateral cingulate gyrus, and ipsilateral lateral premotor cortex. Activation in the bilateral SMA was greater at the initial study but reduced over time compared to healthy controls and poor recoverers. Patients with severe impairment and poor recovery (n =4) showed limited activation of contralateral SM1 and SMA at both studies and no significant change over time. A posterior shift in SM1 activation was evident in good and poor recoverers. Conclusions. Activation of typical motor regions and recruitment of additional sites occur subacutely poststroke, with evolution to normal patterns in moderately impaired patients who recover well. In comparison, severely impaired, poor-recovery patients show persistent, reduced activation. Dynamic changes in SMA, differentially observed in good recoverers over 6 months, highlight its importance in recovery.

Key Words: Cerebrovascular accident • Neuronal plasticity • Brain Mapping • Hand • Motor cortex

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 20, No. 1, 24-41 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968305283053


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Enzinger, H. Dawes, H. Johansen-Berg, D. Wade, M. Bogdanovic, J. Collett, C. Guy, U. Kischka, S. Ropele, F. Fazekas, et al. Brain Activity Changes Associated With Treadmill Training After Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2460 - 2467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Askim, B. Indredavik, T. Vangberg, and A. Haberg Motor Network Changes Associated With Successful Motor Skill Relearning After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Longitudinal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 295 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Eisner-Janowicz, S. Barbay, E. Hoover, A. M. Stowe, S. B. Frost, E. J. Plautz, and R. J. Nudo Early and Late Changes in the Distal Forelimb Representation of the Supplementary Motor Area After Injury to Frontal Motor Areas in the Squirrel Monkey J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1498 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, A. Durand, and J. Doyon Clinical Assessment of Motor Imagery After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 330 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, P. R. Smale, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 170 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Dancause Vicarious Function of Remote Cortex following Stroke: Recent Evidence from Human and Animal Studies Neuroscientist, December 1, 2006; 12(6): 489 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]