SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olesen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olesen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reproducibility and Utility of a Simple Neurological Scoring System for Stroke Patients (Copenhagen Stroke Scale)

Jes Olesen

Kim Simonsen

Bjarne Nørgaard

Margith Grønbæk

Ole Steen Johansen

Arne Krogsgaard

Bjørn Andersen

We have developed a 10-item scoring system for estimation of initial severity of neurologic deficit and its subsequent course in stroke patients. The present study evaluated correlations between 10 clinical tests and assessed inter- and intraobserver variation when the scoring system was used by physicians without extensive neurological training. The intraobserver variation for the total score of each patient ranged from 0 to 9; mean, 1. Coefficient of variation was 6.6%. Interobserver variation varied from 0 to 4.5; mean, 2. Coefficient of variation was 8.5%. The pairwise correlations between individual items ranged from insignificant to 0.94. Based on a very high correlation between items 7 and 8 and between items 9 and 10, it was believed that items 8 and 10 could be deleted. We propose a revised scale in which all items have been designed with 4 steps. There is reason to expect that improvement may be obtained by different weighting of items. Assignment of weighing factors must, however, await a longitudinal cohort study.

Key Words: Neurological scoring system • —Stroke • —Interobserver variation • —Intra • — observer variation.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 2, No. 2, 59-63 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/136140968800200203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement