SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pham, M.
Right arrow Articles by Birbaumer, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pham, M.
Right arrow Articles by Birbaumer, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Auditory Brain-Computer Interface Based on the Self-Regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials

Mirko Pham

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, mirko.pham{at}uni-tuebingen.de

Thilo Hinterberger

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Nicola Neumann

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Andrea Kübler

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Nadine Hofmayer

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Anke Grether

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Barbara Wilhelm

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Jean-Jacques Vatine

Reuth Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Niels Birbaumer

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

Objectives. Communication support for severely paralyzed patients with visual impairment is needed. Therefore, the feasibility of a brain-computer interface (BCI) using auditory stimuli alone, based on the self-regulation of slow cortical potentials (SCPs), was investigated. Methods. Auditory stimuli were used for task and feedback presentation in an SCP self-regulation paradigm. Voluntarily produced SCP responses and measures of communication performance were compared between 3 groups (total of N = 59) of visual, auditory, and cross-modal visual-auditory modality. Electroencephalogram recordings and training from Cz-mastoids were carried out on 3 consecutive sessions. Data of 1500 trials per subject were collected. Results. Best performance was achieved for the visual, followed by the auditory condition. The performance deficit of the auditory condition was partly due to decreased self-produced positivity. Larger SCP response variability also accounted for lower performance of the auditory condition. Cross-modally presented stimuli did not lead to significant learning and control of SCP. Conclusions. Brain-computer communication using auditory stimuli only is possible. Smaller cortical positivity achieved in the auditory condition, as compared to the visual condition, may be a consequence of increased selective attention to simultaneously presented auditory stimuli. To optimize performance, auditory stimuli characteristics may have to be adapted. Other suggestions for enhancement of communication performance with auditory stimuli are discussed.

Key Words: Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) • Self-regulation • Auditory stimuli • Brain-computer interface • Brain-computer communication

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 19, No. 3, 206-218 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968305277628


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
B. H. Dobkin
Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation
J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 637 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement