Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tallis, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tallis, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 19, No. 1, 4-13 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968304274351
© 2005 American Society of Neurorehabilitation

Reviews

The Potential for Utilizing the "Mirror Neurone System" to Enhance Recovery of the Severely Affected Upper Limb Early after Stroke: A Review and Hypothesis

Valerie M. Pomeroy

Geriatric Medicine, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK, v.pomeroy{at}sghms.ac.uk

Christopher A. Clark

Clinical Neuroscience, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK

J. Simon G. Miller

Child Health, Newcastle University, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Institute of Child Health, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK

Jean-Claude Baron

Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Box 83, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK

Hugh S. Markus

Clinical Neuroscience, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK

Raymond C. Tallis

Geriatric Medicine, University of Manchester, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Eccles Old Road, Manchester M6 8HD, UK

Recovery of upper limb movement control after stroke might be enhanced by repetitive goal-directed functional activities. Providing such activity is challenging in the presence of severe paresis. A possible new approach is based on the discovery of mirror neurons in the monkey cortical area F5, which are active both in observing and executing a movement. Indirect evidence for a comparable human "mirror neurone system" is provided by functional imaging. The primary motor cortex, the premotor cortex, other brain areas, and muscles appropriate for the action being observed are probably activated in healthy volunteers observing another’s movement. These findings raise the hypothesis that observation of another’s movement might train the movement execution system of stroke patients who have severe paresis to bring them to the point at which they could actively participate in rehabilitation consisting of goal-directed activities. The point of providing an observation therapy would be to facilitate the voluntary production of movement; therefore, the condition of interest would be observation with intent to imitate. However, there is as yet insufficient evidence to enable the testing of this hypothesis in stroke patients. Studies in normal subjects are needed to determine which brain sites are activated in response to observation with intent to imitate. Studies in stroke subjects are needed to determine how activation is affected after damage to different brain areas. The information from such studies should aid identification of those stroke patients who might be most likely to benefit from observation to imitate and therefore guide phase I clinical studies.

Key Words: Stroke • Physical therapy • Mirror neurones • Rehabilitation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Celnik, B. Webster, D. M. Glasser, and L. G. Cohen
Effects of Action Observation on Physical Training After Stroke
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1814 - 1820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
B. H. Dobkin
Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation
J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 637 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. Sharma, V. M. Pomeroy, and J.-C. Baron
Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke?
Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1941 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]