This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Beekhuizen, K. S. Articles by Field-Fote, E. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beekhuizen, K. S. Articles by Field-Fote, E. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Massed Practice versus Massed Practice with Stimulation: Effects on Upper Extremity Function and Cortical Plasticity in Individuals with Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence in Functional Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Miami, FL

Edelle C. Field-Fote

The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL

To determine the effect of massed practice (MP) versus massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) on cortical plasticity and function in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. Methods. Ten subjects were assigned to either MP or MP+SS. Median nerve stimulation (500 ms train, 10 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) was delivered at the intensity eliciting a motor threshold response. Training sessions were 5 d/week for 3 weeks at 2 h/session. Outcome measures included 1) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), motor threshold (MT) and MEP amplitude at 1.2 MT; 2) maximal pinch grip force; 3) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Jebsen Hand Function Test. Results. The MP+SS group demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in pinch grip strength (190%), WMFT scores (52%), and Jebsen test scores (33%), whereas the MP group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) only in Jebsen test scores (11%). No significant changes were detected in cortical excitability in the MP+SS or MP group. Conclusions. The findings of this preliminary study suggest that MP+SS results in greater increases in pinch strength and timed functional test scores than MP. Optimal stimulation paradigms and training methods are needed to further test this strategy.

Key Words: SCI • Exercise • Electrical stimulation • Constraint • induced therapy • Rehabilitation • Hand function

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 19, No. 1, 33-45 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968305274517


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Glinsky, L. Harvey, P. van Es, S. Chee, and S. C Gandevia The addition of electrical stimulation to progressive resistance training does not enhance the wrist strength of people with tetraplegia: a randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2009; 23(8): 696 - 704. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J Butler and S. L Wolf Putting the Brain on the Map: Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess and Induce Cortical Plasticity of Upper-Extremity Movement Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 719 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 637 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R Hoffman and E. C Field-Fote Cortical Reorganization Following Bimanual Training and Somatosensory Stimulation in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 208 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]