|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy on Precision Grip: A Preliminary Study
Jay L. Alberts
School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, Atlanta VA Rehab R & D, Atlanta, GA, jay.alberts{at}ap.gatech.edu
Andrew J. Butler
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Steven L. Wolf
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Objective. This preliminary study examines the effects of a 2-week constraint-induced therapy (CIT) intervention on the force-producing capabilities of the hemiparetic hand during the performance of a functional dexterous manipulation task. Methods. A 6-degree-of-freedom force/torque transducer that was embedded into the handle of a key allowed for the quantification of grasping forces and torques produced during the performance of a functional key-turning task. Clinical and kinetic data were collected from 10 subacute patients (3-9 months poststroke) who were participating in an ongoing national clinical study (EXCITE trial) examining the effects of CIT on upper extremity motor performance. Investigators were blinded to treatment designation. Five patients receiving treatment immediately completed 2 weeks of intensive CIT, whereas a group randomized to treatment 1 year later did not receive any therapy during a similar 2-week span. Results .Results indicated that 4 of the 5 patients in the CIT group, compared to the delayed group, showed significant clinical improvements in hand function, increased maximum precision grip force, improved force and torque regulation, and reduced variability in rate of force production during task performance. Conclusions. Improved force control may be a mechanism contributing to the observed improvements in dexterous function in those patients undergoing CIT.
Key Words: Constraint-induced therapy Precision Grip Dexterous function
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 18, No. 4,
250-258 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968304271370

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bogard, S. Wolf, Qin Zhang, P. Thompson, D. Morris, and D. Nichols-Larsen
Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be Streamlined?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
422 - 428.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hammer and B. Lindmark
Is forced use of the paretic upper limb beneficial? A randomized pilot study during subacute post-stroke recovery
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2009;
23(5):
424 - 433.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Caimmi, S. Carda, C. Giovanzana, E. S. Maini, A. M. Sabatini, N. Smania, and F. Molteni
Using Kinematic Analysis to Evaluate Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
February 1, 2008;
22(1):
31 - 39.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Wu, T.-H. Wei, C. Gung, C.-Y. Lee, and J.-S. Liu
Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation,
December 1, 2007;
21(12):
1075 - 1086.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-y. Wu, K.-c. Lin, H.-c. Chen, I-h. Chen, and W.-h. Hong
Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Movement Kinematics and Daily Function in Patients With Stroke: A Kinematic Study of Motor Control Mechanisms
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2007;
21(5):
460 - 466.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L Wolf
Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2007;
87(9):
1212 - 1223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Blennerhassett, T. A. Matyas, and L. M. Carey
Impaired Discrimination of Surface Friction Contributes to Pinch Grip Deficit After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2007;
21(3):
263 - 272.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Boake, E. A. Noser, T. Ro, S. Baraniuk, M. Gaber, R. Johnson, E. T. Salmeron, T. M. Tran, J. M. Lai, E. Taub, et al.
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2007;
21(1):
14 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators
Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
JAMA,
November 1, 2006;
296(17):
2095 - 2104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Underwood, P. C Clark, S. Blanton, D. M Aycock, and S. L Wolf
Pain, Fatigue, and Intensity of Practice in People With Stroke Who Are Receiving Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2006;
86(9):
1241 - 1250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|