Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKay, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sherwood, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKay, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sherwood, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 18, No. 3, 144-153 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0888439004267674
© 2004 American Society of Neurorehabilitation

Clinical Neurophysiological Assessment of Residual Motor Control in Post-Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis

W. B. McKay

2002 Holcombe (153), Houston, TX 77030, wbmckay{at}bcm.tmc.edu

H. K. Lim

M. M. Priebe

D. S. Stokic

A. M. Sherwood

Objective. This study was designed to characterize the rudimentary residual lower-limb motor control that can exist in clinically paralyzed spinal-cord-injured individuals. Methods. Sixty-seven paralyzed spinal-cord-injured subjects were studied using surface electromyography recorded from muscles of the lower limbs and analyzed for responses to a rigidly administered protocol of reinforcement maneuvers, voluntary movement attempts, vibration, or the ability to volitionally suppress withdrawal evoked by plantar surface stimulation. Results. Markers for the subclinical discomplete motor syndrome were found in 64% of the subjects. The tonic vibration response was recorded in 37%, volitional plantar surface stimulation response suppression in 27%, and reinforcement maneuver responses in 6% of the subjects. Three subjects, 4%, produced reliable but very low amplitude surface electromyography during the voluntary movement segment of the protocol. Surface electromyography recorded during passive leg movement was related to Ashworth scores as was the tonic vibration response marker (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Multimuscle surface electromyography patterns recorded during a rigidly administered protocol of motor tasks can be used to differentiate between clinically paralyzed spinal-cord-injured individuals using subclinical motor output to identify the translesional neural connections that remain available for intervention testing and treatment planning after spinal cord injury.

Key Words: Spinal cord injury • Paralysis • Electromyography • Motor control


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?