This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boyd, L. A. Articles by Winstein, C. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boyd, L. A. Articles by Winstein, C. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Cerebellar Stroke Impairs Temporal but not Spatial Accuracy during Implicit Motor Learning

University of Kansas Medical Center, 3056 Robinson, Mail Stop 2002, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160-7601, Lboyd{at}kumc.edu

Carolee J. Winstein

Objective. Numerous studies have demonstrated cerebellar activity during implicit motor learning, but few have addressed its specific role. The purpose of this study was to determine if specific components (spatial or temporal) of an implicit motor-tracking task were affected by cerebellar stroke. Methods. The authors studied the performance of individuals with unilateral cerebellar stroke (n =7)and a control group (n = 10) across 3 acquisition days and at a delayed retention test as they practiced a unimanual tracking task with the contralesional upper extremity. Results. After cerebellar stroke, participants demonstrated reduced tracking errors for repeating sequences compared to random sequences; however, decomposition of tracking performance into temporal and spatial components revealed persistent deficits in tracking time lag despite improved spatial accuracy. A lesion analysis showed that the dentate nucleus was the only common region affected by all cerebellar strokes. Conclusions. During implicit motor learning, the cerebellum appears to participate in the formation of predictive strategies for the timing of motor responses, rather than for the accuracy of motor execution. Because deficits were found in the contralesional upper extremity, the authors suggest that this function is not lateralized to 1 hemisphere; cerebellar output may affect the formation of an internal model for timing movements in both upper extremities.

Key Words: Cerebellum • Stroke • Motor • Implicit learning • Human

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A Boyd, E. D Vidoni, and C. F Siengsukon Multidimensional Motor Sequence Learning Is Impaired in Older But Not Younger or Middle-Aged Adults Physical Therapy, March 1, 2008; 88(3): 351 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Boyd, B. M. Quaney, P. S. Pohl, and C. J. Winstein Learning Implicitly: Effects of Task and Severity After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 444 - 454. [PDF]

				R. T. Jessop, C. Horowicz, and L. E. Dibble Motor learning and Parkinson disease: refinement of movement velocity and endpoint excursion in a limits of stability balance task. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 459 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]