|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Home Forced Use in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Program for Adults with Hemiplegia: A Pilot Study
Samuel R. Pierce
Department of Research, Shriners Hospital for Children, 3551 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140. spierce{at}shrinenet.org
Kara G. Gallagher
Susan W. Schaumburg
Arthur M. Gershkoff
John P. Gaughan
Lori Shutter
The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a program of traditional outpatient neurological rehabilitation that included home forced use. In total, 17 patients with chronic stroke and 1 patient with subacute stroke (mean time poststroke = 27.6 months) completed an individualized program consisting of seven 2-hour treatment sessions composed of 1 hour of occupational therapy and 1 hour of physical therapy. Therapy sessions were completed over a 2- to 3-week period and included instruction on the use of a restraining mitt at home during functional activities. The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used to assess upper extremity impairment and function at baseline, midway through treatment, and posttreatment. Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons) in mean time for completion in 12 of 17 WMFT subtasks when comparing baseline to posttreatment. The preliminary results suggest that the forced-use component of constraint-induced therapy may be effective when applied within a traditional outpatient rehabilitation program. However, additional investigation is required to examine the effectiveness of using forced use within typical outpatient rehabilitation under more experimentally controlled conditions.
Key Words: Rehabilitation Arm Cerebrovascular
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 17, No. 4,
214-219 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0888439003259424

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Wolf
On "Effects of forced use on arm function in the subacute phase..." Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Phys Ther. 2009;89:526-539.
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2009;
89(9):
993 - 995.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J Page, P. Levine, A. Leonard, J. P Szaflarski, and B. M Kissela
Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical Therapy,
March 1, 2008;
88(3):
333 - 340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Burns, J. Burridge, and R. Pickering
Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?
Clinical Rehabilitation,
October 1, 2007;
21(10):
895 - 904.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Kaplon, M. G. Prettyman, C. L. Kushi, and C. J. Winstein
Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT)
Clinical Rehabilitation,
October 1, 2007;
21(10):
950 - 958.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen
Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2007;
21(5):
379 - 387.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L Wolf
Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2007;
87(9):
1212 - 1223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators
Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
JAMA,
November 1, 2006;
296(17):
2095 - 2104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Brogardh and B. H Sjolund
Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use
Clinical Rehabilitation,
March 1, 2006;
20(3):
218 - 227.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|