SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shutter, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shutter, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Home Forced Use in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Program for Adults with Hemiplegia: A Pilot Study

Samuel R. Pierce

Department of Research, Shriners Hospital for Children, 3551 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140. spierce{at}shrinenet.org

Kara G. Gallagher

Susan W. Schaumburg

Arthur M. Gershkoff

John P. Gaughan

Lori Shutter

The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a program of traditional outpatient neurological rehabilitation that included home forced use. In total, 17 patients with chronic stroke and 1 patient with subacute stroke (mean time poststroke = 27.6 months) completed an individualized program consisting of seven 2-hour treatment sessions composed of 1 hour of occupational therapy and 1 hour of physical therapy. Therapy sessions were completed over a 2- to 3-week period and included instruction on the use of a restraining mitt at home during functional activities. The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used to assess upper extremity impairment and function at baseline, midway through treatment, and posttreatment. Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons) in mean time for completion in 12 of 17 WMFT subtasks when comparing baseline to posttreatment. The preliminary results suggest that the forced-use component of constraint-induced therapy may be effective when applied within a traditional outpatient rehabilitation program. However, additional investigation is required to examine the effectiveness of using forced use within typical outpatient rehabilitation under more experimentally controlled conditions.

Key Words: Rehabilitation • Arm • Cerebrovascular

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 17, No. 4, 214-219 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0888439003259424


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L. Wolf
On "Effects of forced use on arm function in the subacute phase..." Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Phys Ther. 2009;89:526-539.
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2009; 89(9): 993 - 995.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. J Page, P. Levine, A. Leonard, J. P Szaflarski, and B. M Kissela
Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2008; 88(3): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Burns, J. Burridge, and R. Pickering
Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 895 - 904.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. T. Kaplon, M. G. Prettyman, C. L. Kushi, and C. J. Winstein
Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT)
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 950 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen
Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L Wolf
Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators
Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. Brogardh and B. H Sjolund
Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2006; 20(3): 218 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement