This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bastings, E. P. Articles by Good, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bastings, E. P. Articles by Good, D. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hand Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Mapping Study of Motor Output Areas and Their Relation to Functional Status

Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration

Jason P. Greenberg

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC

David C. Good

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC

The respective contributions of the stroke and undamaged hemispheres to motor recovery after stroke remains controversial. The aim of this article is to evaluate the relationship between location and size of cortical motor areas and outcome after stroke. Twelve controls and 12 stroke patients were studied. Hand cortical motor output areas were determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded simultaneously from both hands. Functional motor abilities were evaluated using well-validated measures. Surface area, weighted surface area, and center of gravity of motor output areas were calculated. Different patterns of motor output areas to the paretic hand were observed; there was no motor output from the stroke hemisphere in patients with poor outcome, contrasting to large motor output area in the stroke hemisphere in patients with good outcome, regardless of infarct size or location. A significant correlation was found between measures of motor outcome in the stroke-affected upper extremity and both the surface area and weight of the central motor output area in the stroke hemisphere. No ipsilateral motor response was obtained after stimulation of either hemisphere. These data support an association between preservation of cortical motor output area to the paretic hand in the stroke hemisphere and good motor outcome.

Key Words: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) • Brain mapping • Stroke • Motor recovery • Hand

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 16, No. 3, 275-282 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/154596802401105207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Sawaki, A. J. Butler, Xiaoyan Leng, P. A. Wassenaar, Y. M. Mohammad, S. Blanton, K. Sathian, D. S. Nichols-Larsen, S. L. Wolf, D. C. Good, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 505 - 513. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Hiscock, S. Miller, J. Rothwell, R. C. Tallis, and V. M. Pomeroy Informing Dose-Finding Studies of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Enhance Motor Function: A Qualitative Systematic Review Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 228 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Desmurget, F. Bonnetblanc, and H. Duffau Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 898 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Boake, E. A. Noser, T. Ro, S. Baraniuk, M. Gaber, R. Johnson, E. T. Salmeron, T. M. Tran, J. M. Lai, E. Taub, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]