This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968309334208v1 23/7/699    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Devos, H. Articles by De Weerdt, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Devos, H. Articles by De Weerdt, W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparison of the Effect of Two Driving Retraining Programs on On-Road Performance After Stroke

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Hannes.Devos{at}faber.kuleuven.be.

	Abstract

Background. Several driving retraining programs have been developed to improve driving skills after stroke. Those programs rely on different rehabilitation concepts. Objectives. The current study sought to examine the specific carryover effect of driving skills of a comprehensive training program in a driving simulator when compared with a cognitive training program. Methods. Further analysis from a previous randomized controlled trial that investigated the effect of simulator training on driving after stroke. Forty-two participants received simulator-based driving training, whereas 41 participants received cognitive training for 15 hours. Overall performance in the on-road test and each of its 13 items were compared between groups immediately posttraining and at 6 months poststroke. Results. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that the total score on the on-road test and each item score improved significantly over time for both groups. Those who received driving simulator training achieved better results when compared with the cognitive training group in the overall on-road score and the items of anticipation and perception of signs, visual behavior and communication, quality of traffic participation, and turning left. Most of the differences in improvement between the 2 interventions were observed at 6 months poststroke. Conclusions. Contextual training in a driving simulator appeared to be superior to cognitive training to treat impaired on-road driving skills after stroke. The effects were primarily seen in visuointegrative driving skills. Our results favor the implementation of driving simulator therapy in the conventional rehabilitation program of subacute stroke patients with mild deficits.

First published on April 22, 2009, doi:10.1177/1545968309334208

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009;23:699.

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?