SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miyai, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kajiura, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miyai, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kajiura, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Functional Outcome of Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke

Ichiro Miyai

Department of Neurology, Toneyama National Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Tsunehiko Suzuki

Director, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Katsumasa Kii

Department of Physical Therapy, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka Japan

Jin Kang

Department of Neurology, Toneyama National Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Ichiro Kajiura

Former Director, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Osaka Japan

Background and Purpose: To test whether multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) is effective in improving functional outcome in chronic stroke.

Methods: Retrospective review of functional outcome of MDR in 136 consecu tive patients with first single stroke. Patients were divided into early group (E: days after stroke ( 90, n = 47) and late group (L: > 90, n = 89). Outcome was assessed by using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Stroke Impairment As sessment Set (SIAS).

Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, type of stroke, and side of stroke. The mean length of stay was significantly longer (p < 0.05) in E (138 days) than in L (114 days). The mean FIM (admission/discharge) was 88/103 in E and 88/97 in L. The mean SIAS was 11/14 in E and 10/13 in L. There was no signif icant difference in gain of FIM and SIAS score between the groups. There was also no difference in gain of FIM between E and L in three subgroups based on admission FIM score (severe disability: 18-53, moderate: 54-89, mild: 90-126).

Conclusions: MDR is effective in improving functional outcome of stroke patients regardless of starting point of MDR or initial severity of disability. Key Words: Stroke—Rehabilitation—Functional Independence Measure (FIM)—Stroke Impair ment Assessment Set (SIAS).

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 12, No. 3, 95-99 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/154596839801200303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement