This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Carey, L. M. Articles by Matyas, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Carey, L. M. Articles by Matyas, T. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Impaired Touch Discrimination After Stroke: A Quantiative Test

School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia, and Neurology Department, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Austin Campus, Melbourne, Australia

Linda E. Oke, MAppSc

Australian Association of Occupational Therapists, Melbourne, Australia

Thomas A. Matyas, PhD

School of Psychological Science, La Trobc University, Melbourne, Australia

The ability to discriminate differences in tactile stimuli, such as textures, is commonly and characteristically impaired after stroke. Assessment of tactile discrimination is cur rently compromised by measures that are not quantitative and standardized, do not as sess active touch sensibility, or are not suitable for use in clinical settings with stroke patients. Therefore, a test that addressed these limitations was developed. The Tac tile Discrimination Test required subjects to discriminate differences in finely graded plastic ridged surfaces using a three-alternative forced choice design. Test-retest reli ability, based on a sample of 35 stroke patients, was high (r = 0.92), and changes of the magnitude of 27 percent spatial increase (PSI) can be detected with 95 percent confidence, which is sufficiently accurate for clinical monitoring. A matched pairs study of 50 stroke and 50 unimpaired subjects found that normal performance scores were contained within the 3-46 PSI range. The conservative criterion of abnormal ity was defined as 46 PSI, with a zone of uncertainty from 31 to 61 PSI. The test dif ferentiated well impaired performance relative to normal standards. These results sup port the application of the Tactile Discrimination Test as a quantitative, standardized measure appropriate for testing stroke patients in clinical settings. Key Words: Cere brovascular disorders—Standardized assessment—Somsatosensory—Tactile—Hand.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 11, No. 4, 219-232 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/154596839701100404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?