SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semlyen, J.K.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, M.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Semlyen, J.K.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, M.P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Newcastle Independence Assessment Form—Research: Development of an Alternative Functional Measure

J.K. Semlyen

E. Hurrell

S. Carter

M.P. Barnes

Academic Unit of Neurological Rehabilitation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Hunters Moor Regional Rehabilitation Centre, NE2 4NR, UK

The Newcastle Independence Assessment Form—Research (NIAF-R) is a 55-item global measure of the functional independence of people with neurologic disability. It has been designed to establish outcome over time—throughout recovery and at long- term follow-up. This paper recounts the development of this scale and demonstrates its expediency, acknowledging the presence of other less suitable or less user-friendly extended ADL and global functional assessment measures. Interrater agreement was demonstrated throughout the developmental stages of the NIAF-R. The majority of kappa ratings were greater than 0.6 in a comparison .between the NIAF-R and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Values at this level are agreed to be a sub stantial result. Recommendations for future analyses include validation studies at longer term follow-up and with a wider range of neurologic disabilities, an increased sample size to increase statistical power, and further testing to establish NIAF-R as a clinical tool.

Key Words: Key Words: Newcastle Independence Assessment Form-Research-Neurologic rehabilitation—Functional outcome measurement.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 10, No. 4, 251-257 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/154596839601000405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement