This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zeilig, G. Articles by Drubach, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Zeilig, G. Articles by Drubach, D. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Metastatic and Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Acute Rehabilitation Outcome, Post-Discharge Placement, and One Year Survival

Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Montebello Rehabilitation Hospital, 2201 Argonne Drive. Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Michal Katz-Zeilig

Department of Family Medicine, University of Tel-Aviv Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Pablo A. Celnik

Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Montebello Rehabilitation Hospital, 2201 Argonne Drive. Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Daniel A. Drubach

Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Montebello Rehabilitation Hospital, 2201 Argonne Drive. Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Paraplegia following metastatic spinal damage is associated with specific problems that require expert attention and management. Out of 744 consecutive admissions to a Spinal Cord Injury Unit, the acute rehabilitation outcomes, the post-discharge place ments, and the one-year survival rates of twenty patients with metastatic spinal cord lesions (MSCL) were compared to twenty-four patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the same age range and level of neurologic injury.

The rehabilitation outcome was measured using the Functional Independence Mea sure scores, the efficiency and the efficacy scores, and the length of stay in the inpatient rehabilitation unit.

Although the average FIM scores at admission were higher in the MSCL group (70 vs. 65.63), their discharge FIM scores were lower than in the TSCI group (88.28 vs. 96.1). The efficacy score was significantly worse in the MSCL group ( p = .01) and there was no significant difference in efficiency between both groups.

The median length of stay was shorter in the MSCL group (33.09 vs. 48.74 days), but they were much less likely to be discharged home (55% vs. 83.3%); the remaining MSCL patients went to acute or chronic hospitals or to a hospice.

A one-year followup of fourteen patients of the MSCL group showed a 21.4% sur vival rate, while all eighteen patients of the TSCI group survived. Our findings suggest the need for a reviewed approach in the rehabilitation of this population.

Key Words: Key Words: Paraplegia—Metastatic spinal tumors—Rehabilitation.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 10, No. 1, 59-63 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/154596839601000110


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?